If models can flow between systems it will be easy for developers on different levels. The system may be operated by non programming staff, but coding may be done in some cases for individual customization.īy my point of view it should be very useful to have a common xml or any other format to share files between such systems like Enterprise Architect, Camunda, Bizagi etc. But this is static and dead models as well.īizagi do have a very nice presentation of their system on “bright-talk” webinar, and focusing on the easy way of doing modeling, configuration and prosess in BPM with live models, easily changed and minimum of coding neccesary. The free version in combination with windows paint give easy nice and colorful results. It is with great joy to make easy models very quick. But as far as I have seen this is static and dead models not connected by configuration to any BPM systems or similar realtime business systems, databases and net applications or apps.Ĭamunda modeler is the open source, free and easy way with choosing symbols and minor, but is menu for configuration. What is the aim of model and is it possible to create living and active models?īy using Enterprise Architect the work getting less joyful, is it only because I am not getting deep enought into it yet?Įnterprise Architect (Sparx) is very complex and complicated many menu controled election and seems attractive to coding staff who daily used to write lines with code and think (basic) programming without configuration tools. I start to ask myself why should models be easy and joyful to do? for whom is the model app created? It was the youtube channel who gave a lot of information to progress within the BPMN2.0 format… Now some newbie idealists is suggesting me to start model in Enterprise Architect (Sparx) which I find a bit compex and harder to use.
I was starting modeling with easy and free draw.io on the net based program version, and further modeling in Camunda freeware version.
0 kommentar(er)
